See what the audit output looks like

Explore synthetic examples of the Engineer and Executive reports, plus a managed-audit comparison. All names, findings, dates and addresses in these examples are invented; they contain no customer or HOME audit data.

Two audiences, two report views

Report output charm representing the engineer report.

Engineer report

Technical remediation view

Useful for firewall engineers, security engineers, remediation planning, rule review, and technical audit follow-up.

  • Security posture summary and audit metadata
  • Severity breakdown for remediation planning
  • Illustrative finding scope, remediation owner and due date
  • Changes since the previous comparable audit
Report output charm representing the executive report.

Executive report

Leadership-facing summary

Useful for leadership review, compliance discussions, governance updates, and prioritising security work.

  • High-level posture and business-facing risk context
  • Most material areas of concern for non-engineering readers
  • Severity summary for governance review
  • New versus resolved risk and overdue remediation

Illustrative change intelligence

What changed between two managed audits?

Posture 72% to 78% (+6 points). One new Critical failure needs action; one High finding was resolved; two findings remain open. A new Critical alert is sent once for that failure episode. The still-failing items do not generate repeat alerts on every audit.

FindingPreviousCurrentAction
Administrator MFA, global scopePassedNew Critical failureAssign an owner and due date
Restricted management sources, global scopeHigh failureResolvedRetain the audit evidence
Policy logging, root VDOM, policy 42FailedStill failingContinue remediation

This is a synthetic example. A skipped or unevaluated rule is not counted as resolved.

Next step

Ready to compare the sample with your own firewall?

Run a first audit when you are ready, or review the handling model before you upload an authorised config.